Seismic Response of Geocell Retaining Walls: Experimental Studies
Study found that Neoloy® Geocell-reinforced walls suffered from little deformation when subjected to significant seismic activity
This paper summarizes the seismic response of five large-scale retaining walls having a Neoloy Geocell facing. The walls were subjected to the scaled horizontal and vertical motions as recorded during the 1995 Kobe earthquake.
- Report on seismic response of Neoloy Geocell-reinforced earth retention walls at the shake table National Seismic Research Institute in Japan, to seismic activity similar to a severe earthquake.
- Study aimed to determine the failure mechanisms and Neoloy performance.
- Results found that deformation was negligible or within acceptable values and the walls remained stable.
This paper summarizes the seismic response of five large-scale retaining walls having a geocell facing. The walls were 2.8m high and the backfill and foundation soil were a fine sand compacted to 90% standard Proctor density (relative density of 55%). The first two walls were of the same geometry, with a tapered facing made of geocells each of height 20cm, one infilled with gravel and the other with sand. In Wall 3, a facing of depth 60cm was constructed while the backfill sand was reinforced with a polyester geogrid. Wall 4 was similar to Wall 3 except that the backfill was reinforced with several geocell layers. Wall 5 had thin geocell layers of 5cm height as reinforcements in order to improve the performance compared with Wall 4. The walls were subjected to the scaled horizontal and vertical motions as recorded during the 1995 Kobe earthquake, 4.5m/s2 (450gal) and 9.0m/s2 (900gal) maximum horizontal accelerations in the first and second excitations, respectively. In an attempt to induce failure, and therefore, to investigate the failure mechanism, Walls 3-5 were subjected to a third shaking in which the horizontal accelerations were scaled to 12.0m/s2 (1,200gal). The walls were fully instrumented with accelerometers, laser displacement transducers, force transducers, and strain gauges. All five walls performed satisfactorily under the simulated earthquake motions. An improved wall performance was seen with the geocells acting as reinforcement layers. The study showed that geocells can be used successfully to form gravity walls as well as reinforcement layers even when subjected to a very high seismic load beyond that of the Kobe earthquake.