The goal of geosynthetic reinforcement is to optimize the resources used to construct a solid, stabilized base and subbase for the pavement or other construction. Neoloy Tough-Cells are an ideal geosynthetic soil stabilization and reinforcement solution for geotechnical engineering:
Neoloy reinforcement outperforms any other geocell, geogrid or geosynthetic solution. See for yourself how Neoloy compares.
PRS Geo-Technologies Neoloy Tough-Cells Comparison With Other Geosynthetics Neoloy Tough-Cells Comparison to Geogrids
Neoloy 3D Confinement Offers Superior and Sustainable Reinforcement
Use sand, marginal and recycled materials to achieve higher confinement and modulus improvement than with geogrids
Neoloy Tough-Cells and geogrids are both reinforcement geosynthetics, but they offer distinct advantages and disadvantages. This comparison will highlight the key differences to help you select the optimal solution for your project.
Neoloy Tough-Cells are a revolutionary 3D honeycomb structure designed to excel in soil stabilization. Their key advantage lies in the three-dimensional confinement they provide, unlike the 2D tensioned membrane mechanism of geogrids.
Geogrids, while offering a solution for soil stabilization, have limitations when compared to Neoloy Tough-Cells. Their 2D grid structure provides a limited confined zone and requires specific infill materials, often leading to higher costs and environmental impact.
The table below summarizes the key advantages of Neoloy Tough-Cells:
Parameter | Neoloy Tough-Cells | Geogrids |
Infill Requirements | Wide range (ungraded, marginal, local soils, recycled materials, sand) | High-quality, costly well-graded ballast, stone and gravel |
Sensitivity to Saturated Soil | Low – maintains confinement, strength when saturated | High – saturation lowers strength, increases settlements |
Confinement Zone | Extends well beyond 100-200 mm cell height, high reinforcement factor | Limited vertical zone |
Effect of Vertical Loading | Verified beam effect (semi-rigid slab) – limits lateral deformation | No beam effect, relies on high deformation |
Modulus Improvement Factor (MIF) | Substantial improvement | Modest improvement |
Typical Road Thickness Reduction Factor | Up to 70% | Up to 45% |
Extend Lifespan & Lower Maintenance | Extends lifespan, reduces maintenance costs | Varies depending on geogrid type and layers |
Cost-Effectiveness | Higher unit cost offset by performance and infill options | Lower unit cost but lower performance |
Sustainability | High (uses local soils and recycled materials) | Low (requires specific aggregates) |
Installation | Reduces structural layers to save time and money | May require multiple layers to achieve higher reinforcement |
Effectiveness on Soft Soils | Highly effective on sand, expansive clay, and peat | Partially effective on sand and expansive clay |
While both Neoloy Tough-Cells and geogrids offer benefits, a hybrid solution can be particularly advantageous. Combining Neoloy Tough-Cells in the structural layers with a geogrid working platform on the subgrade layer has proven highly effective in numerous applications. This approach leverages the advantages of both materials:
PRS Geo Technologies Ltd.
Copyright © 2025 PRS Geo-Technologies. All Rights Reserved.