Geosynthetic Soil Stabilization Confinement – Neoloy Geocells and Geogrids

Leading researchers in Holland, USA and India have conducted field trials for geosynthetics reinforcement of road bases. Test data based on deformation, stiffness and reinforcement factors for Neoloy Geocells consistently show higher results for Neoloy Geocells vs. geogrids, in addition to their ability to utilize marginal materials for infill. Hybrid solutions combining geogrids on the subgrade layer and Neoloy Geocells in the base layer have also proven highly effective.

CIMG2613 copy



NPA Geocell Reduction Factor (RF) Compared to Geogrids


This controlled field trial, conducted by KIWA (formely KOAC-NPC), the leading road research and standards institute in Netherlands in 2008,... (Read more)

Service Road Govind India22



NPA Geocell Pavement Reinforcement Compared to Other Geosynthetics


Field and lab tests by Rajagopal show the modulus improvement factor of NPA Geocells is 2.90 higher than planar... (Read more)

SHRP2-1



Compaction “Roadeo” Field Trial – Center for Earthworks Engineering, White, et al (2012)


The comparative “Roadeo” field test, evaluated the different engineering properties of 4 geosynthetics in poorly-graded sand embankments of new highway... (Read more)